EE: Single-Channel Guests for non-team members
For IT policy compliance, offer the ability to invite non-team members users to Mattermost as "single-channel guests" to have access to read and write to one channel and direct message any other users in that channel.
Potential scenarios include opening discussions with non-team members, including customers, vendors, partners and interview candidates.
This feature is planned for Enterprise Edition and can be tracked with this ticket: https://mattermost.atlassian.net/browse/MM-10057
I totally agree with the comments that this should be a Team Edition feature. We're already doing it by having a separate team for external people, but it's an awkward workaround for a small company--basically, everyone in the company is in both teams just to enable us to have one channel that we can invite non-employees to. Not to mention that we have to configure the email domain for every outsider we want to invite.
Small teams and sole proprietors need it even more than deep-pocketed enterprises.
I think this should definitely make it into Team Edition. The main use case for us would be to have a channel for communicating with potential team members during the interview process. As a small non-profit do we really have to count as an enterprise to allow our team to grow, while keeping our communications on a single platform?
Small teams need this feature a lot. We are four people, and are using other people to work with us - and allowing them to see just one channel is really important and needed !
Nate Gardner commented
This feature is free in Discord and works quite well. As a member of a small startup (25 people) we frequently want to invite non-members to our Slack server without giving them full permissions. To do this, we ended up creating a second Slack server just for communicating with non-members. We would switch to Mattermost in a heartbeat if this was available for free. Even if this was in E10, we would probably buy. But E20? No way. We're not enterprise. We're a humble group of geeks. Can't be bothered! Please listen to your users.
As you can see by the number of votes, your users would not be confused by this feature. I love your sentence that starts with: "We think of this as a feature for corporate compliance, and feel it would confuse Team Edition if it were added." <-- This is soo oldschool product development. I think, I feel ... listen to the customer
Tejay Cardon commented
So, this has been "planned" for over a year and has more than 500 votes. Any chance it's actually going to get scheduled and worked on someday?
Željko Trogrlić commented
This feature is critical for Scrum teams as Product Owner is often external.
Pascal Diener commented
It's really annoying and not understandable why this Feature only comes to E20 and not E10. As already written, it's possible to do this as well with Private Groups, but that's as well not the meaning of such a tool!
It is a Feature which could be hardly used by smaller companies, where I see E10. It makes no sense to add full User for example for external temporary workers or to get a Customer into a discussion.
Wish would be to have it in Team Edition, but it could be a compromise to have it in E10.
To push it into E20 is just a reason to don't choose Mattermost.
It's unclear to moe whether or not this feature has already been implemented in enterprise edition?
We too would love this feature. We currently pay for Slack and use the single channel users for managing contractors. But we'd really love to support a Go based and self hosted solution and are looking to move to MatterMost, but this is a bit of a deal breaker currently. Is there a timeline for this feature?
I find the planned response for "Enterprise Edition" ONLY, absurd. Sure backing on your Manifesto about teams is a great fallback (for the response), But your neglecting the teams that have to work with other entities and new potential teammates.
This feature is basically already possible if you make all your "Channels" -> "Private Groups"... So what are you gaining by not letting this be a real feature?
You are losing startups / small businesses from adopting this platform to run their "Team" because of this real world scenario.
Enterprise Edition should focus on TRUE Enterprise requirements and not hinder the startup / small business "Teams".
Ben Edwards commented
E20 only? Really. Why isn't this an E10 feature? I am really happy to not get the super fancy large anterprise features but this makes me very sad. It effectively means small businesses can't have temporary contractors / external clients etc on mattermost.
Dheeraj Bhaskar commented
We'd like this too. Need more compelling things to ditch slack - lesser cost of a product is definitely a huge motivator. Mattermost keeps talking about additional "value" but how about cutting cost, because remember, self-hosted means adding to additional IT Ops costs (incl. time and effort) so balance your costs please
Fero Novak commented
Shame this is planned only for enterprise edition. I would prefer couple of paid Slack features to be free as biggest Mattermost driver. If you compare like-to-like Mattermost has terrible applications. Lets have enterprise features like SSO, certificates, video & audio conference as paid but couple of niche features for free compared to Slack.
Anton Akhmerov commented
Any chance for this feature to materialize after a year ?
We are about to pay for an integration with project management software which we use, but need to separate company insiders from contractors (reduce contractors view of all channels and users only to those in which they participate/share with).
Robert Lemke commented
Definitely an important feature for us, as we usually open project channels in Slack which we give access to to our customer and others involved in the project. Creating a whole new team for this purpose is a bit too much.
Sergio Nadal commented
Sure it will help for light users and external users. Keen to see this added to Mattermost !
Additionally it should be possible to en-/disable direct messages for users + posting in channels. We want to allow a view guys to see a view of our channels and also allow them to only view some of those channels, they should not be allowed to post something there.