Data Protection from new users
As an administrator, I would like to be able to add new users that cannot read what had been written before they joined.
This somewhat special request has the purpose to ensure privacy to users that already are subscribed. It should be asserted that their statements stay confidential among the scope of users that could read them when they wrote it.
I guess that's not possible yet, is it?
-
Rick commented
I don't understand how in 2024 this must-have forward privacy feature is still not implemented in mattermost. Chat apps in turn some kind of a company memory (including all private discussions); and a new employee can just come, dump all the history, then leave the company. There is no useful workaround.
-
Dave commented
This is the most important feature I've found lacking so far when it comes to evaluating Mattermost as a replacement for Slack
-
Phillip Ly commented
Upvoting this please!
-
wolfi commented
This is critical. Users need assurance that a level of 'forward privacy', if you will, exists. It is trivial to implement, so it's surprising this hasn't been done by March 2016.
-
Masin Al-Dujaili commented
Any update on this suggestion?
-
Maria Molina commented
It's a must-have feature
-
Mike Cuomo commented
This feature request matters the most
-
Anonymous commented
Please add this feature guys..
-
Anonymous commented
I'm out of votes too, but I need the same feature and actually ended up here after searching if it could already be configured.
-
Anonymous commented
It is very nice feature, i would like to see it asap.
-
Arthur Fckn Dent commented
Hi folks,
I currently face the following problem: I want to invite somebody to a team but I do not want him to see all the history.
So the idea would be, to mark users as users that are not able to see messages (and replies to messages) that have been posted prior to their signup date.
Cheers
Thomas -
Omne commented
This is a great idea.
-
fjarlq commented
This is an excellent idea, and if I hadn't already spent my votes elsewhere, I would vote for this.