Skip to content

Scott

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Scott supported this idea  · 
  2. 706 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Scott supported this idea  · 
  3. 685 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Scott commented  · 

    I find the planned response for "Enterprise Edition" ONLY, absurd. Sure backing on your Manifesto about teams is a great fallback (for the response), But your neglecting the teams that have to work with other entities and new potential teammates.

    This feature is basically already possible if you make all your "Channels" -> "Private Groups"... So what are you gaining by not letting this be a real feature?

    You are losing startups / small businesses from adopting this platform to run their "Team" because of this real world scenario.

    Enterprise Edition should focus on TRUE Enterprise requirements and not hinder the startup / small business "Teams".

    Scott supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base