Skip to content

someone

My feedback

7 results found

  1. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    someone shared this idea  · 
  2. 100 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    someone commented  · 

    Just a follow-up: The repo of the cleaner changed to:

    https://git.somenet.org/pub/jan/mattermost-privileged.git

    Its running every night on at least 3 instances: 2* TE and one EE10.

    Currently cleaning/doing this (tonight's run):

    Mattermost DB cleanup script. Tested on 5.19

    Enforcing enhanced system policy ...
    * [0.02232] 0 deleted 31 days+ not used guest-account(s).
    * [1.17975] 0 deleted 31 days+ not verified account(s).
    * [1.22323] 0 deleted 12 months+ inactive non-public one-user-channel(s).
    * [1.22547] 0 deleted breaking channel(s).

    Enforcing system policy ...
    * [1.55687] 220 deleted all system spam message(s).
    * [1.75893] 5 deleted old BOT-AUTODELETE-FAST message(s).
    * [1.95629] 0 deleted old BOT-AUTODELETE-SLOW message(s).
    * [2.20882] 1 deleted AUTODELETE-PROP-DAY message(s).
    * [2.44673] 0 deleted AUTODELETE-PROP-WEEK message(s).

    Deleting old unused/history data ...
    * [2.45021] 0 deleted unused (implicitly created) DM/Group channel(s).
    * [2.61361] 3994 deleted old audit entries.
    * [2.61563] 1 deleted old job entries.
    * [2.63317] 1279 deleted old linkmetadata entries.
    * [2.67874] 45 deleted old channelmemberhistory entries.

    Deleting 'deleted'/'archived' entries ...
    * [02.8313] 51 deleted 'deleted' post(s).
    * [2.83459] 0 deleted 'deleted' channel(s).
    * [2.83618] 0 deleted 'deleted' emoji(s).
    * [02.8384] 0 deleted 'deleted' teammember(s).
    * [2.83949] 0 deleted 'deleted' slash command(s).
    * [02.8406] 0 deleted 'deleted' outgoing webhook(s).
    * [2.84178] 0 deleted 'deleted' incoming webhook(s).

    Deleting orphaned entries ...
    * [2.87812] 0 deleted orphaned private channel(s).
    * [3.45347] 0 deleted orphaned post(s).
    * [4.28844] 3 deleted orphaned post-comment(s).
    * [4.87566] 0 deleted orphaned reaction(s).
    * [4.92934] 0 deleted orphaned channelmember(s).
    * [4.97739] 0 deleted orphaned channelmemberhistory entr(y/ies).
    * [4.98494] 0 deleted orphaned teammember(s).
    * [4.99011] 0 deleted orphaned user status entr(y/ies).
    * [4.99968] 0 deleted orphaned session(s).
    * [5.35271] 4 deleted orphaned file reference(s).

    * [5.38729] 0 deleted orphaned direct_channel_show preference(s).
    * [05.4077] 0 deleted orphaned channel_approximate_view_time preference(s).
    * [5.41207] 0 deleted orphaned favorite_channel preference(s).
    * [5.94737] 0 deleted orphaned flagged_post preference(s).

    Fixing stuff ...
    * [6.02034] 521 inserted public channel(s) into 'materialized view'.
    * [6.02641] 0 deleted public channel group_channel_show preference(s). THIS IS A BUGFIX. SHOULD BE 0!
    * [6.67347] 11 updated channel totalmsgcount.
    * [7.31338] 94 updated non-empty channel lastpostat.
    * [7.41214] 1201 updated channelmember msgcount/lastviewedat. (good enough)

    *** committed ***

    * db-size: 557 MB

    someone shared this idea  · 
  3. 25 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    someone supported this idea  · 
  4. 39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    someone supported this idea  · 
  5. 57 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    someone commented  · 

    hell no!
    only root-level admins, who have access to the database should be able to do this.

  6. 148 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    someone commented  · 

    nononononono. no. no! NO!

    I have postponed the updating for reasons in the past.
    If this is implemented it is mandatory for it to be fully optional!

  7. 126 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  6 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    someone commented  · 

    have you tried matterbridge?

Feedback and Knowledge Base