My feedback

1 result found

1. mute individual users

   388 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   19 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Matthew Rogers supported this idea  ·  February 22, 2021
   An error occurred while saving the comment
   Matthew Rogers commented  ·  February 22, 2021  ·  Delete…

   Clearly, as a team-communication tool, this is problematic to universally mute a colleague (e.g. what if they actually need to use the tool for a work-critical task)

   Perhaps this can be
   1) channel specific: "This person has smart things to say about Project Blue, or the For Sale, but I don't need to know their opinions in ~coffee"
   2) limited only to channels with more than n number of members. That way, smaller project channels will enable unfettered communication, but users can curate their content in large interest-based channels.
   3) auto-collapse instead of 'hide' the content and not have that content trigger an "unread" channel or message notification. That way, the content can be expanded and viewed if another message's content requires context.

   Thanks for the consideration.

   (I guess email could be a backup, huh?)

   Save Submitting...